Types of phakic anterior chamber intraocular lenses
In this article, I will give you, a brief summary of often clinical used phakic anterior chamber intraocular lenses (PAC IOL) types and their advantages and disadvantages.
- PAC IOL Vs. LASIK
PAC IOL
disadvatages:
postoperative astigmatism
refractive error caused by increments in length of the eyes
exact calculation of lens diopter
endothelium risk
infection
Advatages:
reversibility or adjustability
the preservation of accommodation
LASIK
disadvatages:
cornel ablated
small effective optical zones
the predictability and stability of the procedure
halos and glare
unreversibility or unadjustability
infection
Advatages:
the preservation of accommodation
less effection to intraocular system
- Classification
- Angle-Fixated
Strampelli was the first surgeon (in 1953) to implant this. The older products were ZB implant (Domilens Corp., Lyon, France) , ZB 5M (Domilens) and The Nuvita MA 20 (Bausch & Lomb, Claremont, CA) by Baikoff lens. The representative product was Phakic 6 (Ophthalmic Innovations International, Ontario, CA). Model ZSAL-4 (Morcher, Stuttgart, Germany) was similiar to ZB5M. The first foldable, phakic, angle-fixated anterior chamber IOL is the Vivarte lens, manufactured by Ioltech (La Rochelle, France) and distributed by CibaVision (Duluth, Ga) which could be insert to the eye by a 2mm incision. But this kind of lens have flexible haptics. Sometimes will cause problems.

-
- Iris-Fixated
Worst and Fechner’s phakic iris-claw lens is manufactured
and distributed by Ophtec (Gro¨ningen, Netherlands), under the name of Artisan. Do you know the first design of iris fixated lens was by worst? It is heard that the artisan is renamed to verisyse, am I right?

- PAC IOL Complications
- Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss
- Pupil Ovalization
- Retinal detachment (RD)
- Subclinical chronic inflammation
- Glare and halo effects
It is a sad trend that more and more doctors gives up the Angle-Fixated lens because it will damage the cornel’s function. Many papers proved that. The iris claw type seems good for patients. The ICL will cause cataract and secondary glaucoma, but incidence is very low.
| Print article | This entry was posted by ophthalmetry on December 27, 2009 at 2:04 pm, and is filed under Intraocular R.S.. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
about 6 months ago
I admire the valuable information you offer in your articles.Just thought you’d be interested to know that I have added you to my bookmarks You make right points in a concise and pertinent fashion, I will read more of your stuff, thank you for your time.
about 6 months ago
google
about 5 months ago
The writer of http://www.ophthalmetry.com has written a superior article. I got your point and there is nothing to argue about. It is like the following universal truth that you can not disagree with: The most painful household injury is stepping on an upturned plug in just your socks. I will be back.